Name | Wei-Wen Chung |
Title | Professor and Dean of College of Communication, |
Brief Introduction |
|
Recent Publications |
Chung, W. W. (2002). Who is afraid of Heteroglossia? Notes on trained incapacities. Chinese Journal of Communication Research, 1, 27-40. |
Abstract
The Return to Practice
Wei-wen Chung
Social scientists in the non-Western world have long felt dissatisfied with the mainstream thinking imported from the West, which, they believe may result in a distorted picture of local reality. This paper argues that Westernization may not be the real culprit. Rather it is our obsession with universality, which finds its expression in the search for rules, concepts and theory that may narrow our perspective on social reality and consequently throws into prominence the Western influence. Put differently, social research has been haunted by a longstanding epistemological myth that rules, concepts and theory are approximations to reality. To be specific, this paper argues that rules and concepts, which are believed to be the final stage of most social research, fail to account for the dynamics of social practice. Social research has to make drastic departures from our traditional approaches to research practices ranging from data gathering to representation.
This paper attempts to propose an alternative approach to reality. The first section will give a brief account of the criticisms of the traditional approach to social knowledge, with Wittgenstein being its most influential voice. Then I will proceed to lay out a framework for the analysis of social practice. The third section will illustrate the framework using news interview as an example.
No comments:
Post a Comment